Euphrosyne

Directora
Maria Cristina Pimentel

Comissão de Redacção
Abel Pena
Ana Maria Tarrío
Arnaldo do Espírito Santo
Bernardo Mota
José Pedro Serra
Manuel Barbosa
Paulo Farmhouse Alberto
Rodrigo Furtado
Vanda Anastácio

Conselho Científico
Aires Augusto do Nascimento, U. Lisboa
Carlo Santini, U. Perugia
Carmen Codoñer Merino, U. Salamanca
Emilio Suárez de la Torre, U. Pompeu Fabra
Joël Thomas, U. Perpignan
José Manuel Díaz de Bustamante, U. Santiago De Compostela
Manuel Júnior, U. Lisboa
Marc Mayer Y Olivé, U. Barcelona
Paolo Fedeli, U. Bari
Thomas Earle, U. Oxford

Main Language: English
Additional Languages: French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese

Submissions
Submissions should be sent to:
Maria Cristina Pimentel
euphrosyne.ceclassicos@letras.ulisboa.pt

Peer Review Procedure
Euphrosyne considers independent evaluations of submissions highly important.
When an article arrives at Euphrosyne’s office, it receives a ‘process number’ by which it is identified during the entire peer-review process. It will then be submitted to a double-blind peer review system. The first round of evaluation is carried out by the members of the Editorial Commitee, who not only examine the content of the article in respect of its subject matter but also checks to see if it conforms to Euphrosyne’s mission and objectives. The article is either accepted for submission to a referee or rejected if it is deemed either to be outside the scope of subject matter that is suitable for Euphrosyne or if its quality is considered obviously to be substandard. An articles accepted for submission is forwarded for a more demanding review to established scholars who are specialists in the research area of the article.
Each article is sent to two independent and anonymous referees (Portuguese and/or foreign experts), who are asked to classify the article as being publishable, publishable with amendments and improvements, or not publishable. The classification ‘publishable with amendments and improvements’ is by far the most common decision reached. If both peer reviewers agree upon the article’s acceptance or refusal, the editors’ decision regarding publication is made in accordance with one of these recommendations. If the reviewers suggest improvements to the submitted article, the author is invited to revise and resubmit the article. If the two referees disagree, the article is usually sent to a third referee.

Guidelines for Authors
A detailed stylesheet for Euphrosyne can be found at:
https://centroclassicos.letras.ulisboa.pt/euphrosyne/

Ethics, Malpractice and Authorship Statement
https://www.brepols.net/ethics

Archival
All articles are digitally archived in Portico

Dialnet

ERIH PLUS - European Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences

Index religiosus

International Bibliography of Humanism and the Renaissance

IsisCB Sources and Resources for the History of Science and Allied Fields (indexed on article level)

L'Année philologique

Latindex

MLA International Bibliography

Periodicals Index Online

RILM: Répertoire International de Littérature Musicale (coverage 1981-1982)

Scimago Journal & Country Rank SJR

Scopus : INACTIVE, coverage 2011-2016

Ulrichs Web

Web of Science (Core collection, AHCI index)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANVUR Area 10 – Class A
ANVUR Area 10 – Scientific
ANVUR Area 11 – Scientific

CIRC (A Classification in human sciences & C Social Sciences Classification)

Excellence of Research in Australia (ERA) journal list 2018, ARC

VABB-SHW database (Ecoom)