Science Diplomacy
Studies in the Historical Entanglement of Science, Technology and Diplomacy

Method of peer review
double-blind undertaken by an external specialist (i.c. appointed by the Board)
Keywords
science, diplomacy, gender, history, co-production, material culture, global, Cold War, Early Modern
Accepted Language(s):
English
Accepts Contributions in Open Access
The Science Diplomacy series explores the historical entanglements between the scientific and the diplomatic. It examines not only how diplomacy has drawn upon scientific expertise to navigate global challenges, but also gives due attention to how scientific knowledge, practices, and institutions have been shaped by diplomatic agendas. This series provides a platform for critical reflection on how the entanglement between science and diplomacy has fundamentally shaped political and epistemic orders, both past and present.
Particular attention is given to the intertwined epistemic and diplomatic dimensions of scientific work after the Second World War – a period when international organizations, transnational collaborations, and global governance frameworks expanded dramatically. At the same time, this series welcomes research on earlier time periods, underscoring its commitment to a deeply historical approach to a topic often treated in an ahistorical manner.
While emphasizing historical contextualization, this series has an interdisciplinary outlook, bringing together history of science, political history, international relations, philosophy of science, and science and technology studies.
The series adopts a global perspective, encouraging case studies from various regions and cultural contexts, as well as research that emphasizes transnational and interregional exchanges and interconnections. In doing so, it seeks to counterbalance narratives centered exclusively on Europe and North America.
This series welcome proposals for monographs and collective volumes that combine historical and epistemological analysis with a sensitivity to the practical, material, and institutional dimensions of science diplomacy. Contributions may include thematic case studies, comparative approaches, or theoretical interventions that advance our understanding of the field of science diplomacy and the vital questions about power and knowledge it entails.
-
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Main language: English
All volumes in this series are evaluated by the series editor and two additional referees who have been commissioned by virtue of their specialism in the appropriate field. The review process is based strictly on academic grounds and the reports prepared by referees. The series editor ensures that the screening is done independently and without conflicts of interest. The definitive texts supplied by authors are also subject to review by the series editor before being approved for publication.
English language stylesheet can be found at: https://www.brepols.net/permalink/stylesheet-short-refs
Final submissions should be sent to the series editor (maria.rentetzi@fau.de), with the series'publishing manager Eva Schalbroeck (eva.schalbroeck@brepols.net) in copy.Peer review method:
double-blind undertaken by an external specialist