Method of peer review
double-blind undertaken by a specialist member of the Board or an external specialist
history of art, history of Early Modern art, history of Early Modern architecture, reception of antiquity, antiquarianism, global art history, history of archaeology, classical reception, Early Modern, worldwide
Will be partially available as online content
The invention of an imagined antique past, and creative responses to the material remains of ancient ruins and works of art are defining elements of the art, architecture and literature of Europe, the Mediterranean basin, Central and South Asia, and other parts of the world in the Early Modern period.
This series seeks to build and expand upon these areas of research. Many new approaches have opened up in recent decades, for example: the study of fictive notions of the ‘antique’, the intersection of the visual arts and other disciplines, comparative and cross-cultural approaches, and concepts of the ancient past in geographies beyond Europe. The series aims to reflect the current breadth of research, considering questions such as, what are the boundaries between documentation and invention in the reception of the antique? What strategies did artists, architects and others adopt to reconstruct, reinvent and interpret ancient remains? How was antiquity imagined differently in different contexts?
With the aim of advancing the state of research, the series publishes outstanding monographs or collected essays on the Early Modern reception and invention of antiquity, including work inspired by The Census of Antique Works of Art and Architecture Known in the Renaissance.
Cammy Brothers, Northeastern University (series editor)
Kathleen Christian, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (series editor)
David Brafman, Getty Research Institute
Chancal Dadlani, Pomona College
Bianca de’ Divitiis, University of Naples Federico II
Emine Fetvaci, Boston College
Jasenka Gudelj, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia
Heather Hyde-Minor, University of Notre Dame
Edward Wouk, University of Manchester
Carolyn Yerkes, Princeton University
Main Language: English
Double-blind undertaken by a specialist member of the Board or an external specialist
All volumes in this series are evaluated by an Editorial Board, strictly on academic grounds, based on reports prepared by referees who have been commissioned by virtue of their specialism in the appropriate field. The Board ensures that the screening is done independently and without conflicts of interest. The definitive texts supplied by authors are also subject to review by the Board before being approved for publication.
Brepols general stylesheet in English can be found at: https://www.brepols.net/permalink/stylesheet-full-refs
Submissions should be sent to:
Cammy Brothers (email@example.com)
Kathleen Christian (firstname.lastname@example.org)